Corruption probe- saudi economy vulnerable.
Now the hotel is temporarily serving as a luxury
prison where some of the kingdom’s political and business elite are
being held in a widening crackdown on corruption that may change the way
the economy works.
By detaining dozens of
officials and tycoons, a new anti-corruption body headed by Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Salman is seeking to dismantle systems of patronage and
kick-backs that have distorted the economy for decades.
But
it is a risky process, because the crackdown is hurting some of the
kingdom’s top private businessmen - leaders of family conglomerates who
have built much of the non-oil economy over the past few decades.
Many
industries could suffer if investment by these families dries up in
coming months, at a time when the economy has already fallen into
recession because of low oil prices and austerity policies.
Meanwhile,
a new breed of state-backed companies is rising to compete with the old
guard; many of the new enterprises are linked to the Public Investment
Fund (PIF), the kingdom’s top sovereign wealth fund. But it is not clear
how smoothly the transition to these firms will happen.
“The
rules of the game are changing. But they’re changing indiscriminately,”
said one financial analyst in the region, declining to be named because
of political sensitivities.
Some
private businessmen in Saudi Arabia are now trying to move their money
out of the country “while they still can”, the analyst said.
For
many foreigners, the most shocking aspect of the purge has been the
detention of billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the flamboyant,
internationally known chairman of investment firm Kingdom Holding.
But for Saudis, the names of other detainees have been equally stunning:
Nasser bin Aqeel al-Tayyar, founder of the Al Tayyar Travel group;
billionaire Saleh Kamel; and Bakr bin Laden, chairman of the huge Saudi
Binladin construction conglomerate.
The saga of the Binladin group underlines how the
business environment is changing.
Binladin and another big construction
group, Saudi Oger, long enjoyed preferential access to the kingdom’s
biggest projects and control over pricing as a result of their close
relationships with royal patrons.
But the
bottom fell out from under both companies last year, when a cash squeeze
resulting from low oil prices caused the government to cancel or
suspend projects and delay payments.
The firms
faced multi-billion dollar debt restructurings; Binladin has laid off
tens of thousands of people while Oger’s bankers say it has essentially
stopped operating.
At the same time, state oil
giant Saudi Aramco is moving to set up a construction company with local
and international partners to build non-oil infrastructure in Saudi
Arabia - potentially taking billions of dollars of business that would
previously have gone to the family conglomerates.
Aramco
and PIF, the sovereign fund, have also linked up with U.S. construction
firm Jacobs Engineering to form a management company for strategic
projects in the kingdom.
Many in the Saudi
business world are celebrating the downfall of the old patronage system
and the shift toward a “cleaner” business environment.
“It’s great news for the clean ones among us - 99.99 percent are ecstatic,” said one senior executive.
But
others express disquiet about the possible economic fallout of the
purge. Some are concerned that banks could start calling in loans to
families implicated in the probe, using loan clauses that permit this in
cases of legal jeopardy; this could collapse companies’ share prices.
Many
new business deals may be put on hold. A businessman at a foreign
technology services firm told Reuters he had been considering a venture
with a Saudi partner, but decided against it this week because of the
partner’s ties to the detained Bakr bin Laden.
The
new anti-corruption commission has broad authority to seize assets at
home and abroad.
Some businessmen wonder if these powers could be used
to pressure firms into participating in Prince Mohammed’s economic
development projects.
“It’s a further centralizing of political and economic power, and a seizing of the private assets that those fiefdoms have accumulated.”